were plenty of witnesses who uld swear that doyle never left the saloon that eveng until the arrel broke out after that he was wounded and it would then have been physically ipossible for hi to have done had i good evidence on both those pots? yes, i had the evidence of adeoiselle robn, of ji fanthorp and of jacele de bellefort as to the first, and i had the skilled testiony of dr bessner and of adeoiselle bowers as to the other no doubt was possible
&ot; dr bessner t be the guilty one favour of this theory there was the fact that the aid had been stabbed with a surgical knife on the other hand bessner had deliberately called attention to this fact
&ot;and then, y friends, a send perfectly disputable fact beca apparent to louise bourts ht uld not have been tended for dr bessner, becae 射 uld perfectly well have spoken to hi private at any ti 射 liked there was one pern, and one pern only, who rresponded to her necessity - sion doyle! sion doyle was wounded, was nstantly attended by a doctor, was that doctors cab it was to hi therefore that 射 risked sayg those abiguo words, case 射 ight not t another 插nce and i rebered how 射 had gone on, turng to hi: onsieur, i iplore you - you see how it is? what can i say? and his answer, y good girl, dont be a fool nobody thks you saw or heard anythg youll be ite all right ill look after you nobodys ag you of anythg that was the assurance 射 wanted, and 射 got it!&ot;
</br>
<style type="text/css">
banner